United Kingdom
LNG Terminal Tug Optimisation
Our client, an LNG terminal company, appointed Mills Navigation Limited as Independent Maritime Advisor for a real-time navigation simulator study assessing tug configurations for LNG vessel operations.
Background
The client, tug manufacturer and local port authority undertook a real-time navigation simulator study to assess tug configurations and operational limits for LNG carrier movements in the port, initially focused on the existing tug fleet.
MNL’s specific role as Independent Maritime Advisor was to provide experienced professional judgement on the scope, conduct, interpretation and appropriate use of the simulator study outcomes.
Constructively challenging assumptions where appropriate
Interpreting simulator outcomes through an operational marine lens
Identifying sensitivities, caveats and confidence limits within the findings
Supporting sound, proportionate and defensible decision-making based on the study results
Scope of Consultation Services
Review simulator study documentation, including:
Simulator objectives and run matrix
Tug configurations and deployment concepts
Environmental limits and failure scenarios
Success / marginal / fail criteria
Provide advisory input on:
Whether the proposed scope addresses the material marine operational risks
Whether the scenarios and limits are appropriate for SHLNG operations
Any notable omissions, optimistic assumptions or sensitivity areas
Observe selected simulator runs and/or review simulator outputs, recordings and debrief materials
Provide independent professional judgement on:
The operational credibility of manoeuvres and outcomes
The distinction between theoretical capability and sustainable operational practice (As witnessed, and based on, the Real Time Simulations witnessed).
Scenarios or outcomes that appear marginal, finely balanced or context-dependent (this expectation shall be clarified ahead of commencement).
How pilots, harbour authorities and regulators may reasonably interpret the findings
Post-Simulation Advisory Opinion
Following completion of the simulator programme, MNL provided a plain-English report to the client with the following inputs:
Overall confidence in the robustness of the simulator findings
Key sensitivities, assumptions and dependencies
Areas where conclusions are strong versus areas requiring caution
Guidance on how the results should be applied — and where caution should be exercised